This is a minor statement that occurs early on in chapter two and I understand and agree with what Miller is saying, but I want to take a moment to talk about 'religion' and 'habit.' There's a lot of talk these days about Christianity being "a relationship, not a religion" and it seems to me there's a push towards non-denominationalism. In this movement, it seems as though we're quick to forsake the traditions of the high church - the recitation of creeds, the order of worship, formalized prayer.
I grew up in a Lutheran church, mostly, with a few years spent at an Episcopal church. I am very familiar with the traditions of the high church and, truthfully, I really like them. I recently joined the Methodist church and, while it's not as formal as some of the churches I grew up in, it is still based on tradition. Miller says that habit is what prevents a man's heart from engaging God. To some extent I do agree, but I want to point out that habit is often what gets us through the spiritual valleys and what, in turn, reconnects us with God. Reciting a creed reminds me of what I believe - it is the essence of creation, the essence of the gospel. When I'm weary and I feel like my words don't matter or I'm too apathetic for a genuine conversation with God, I can pray as Jesus taught His disciples to pray,
"Our Father, who art in Heaven,
Hallowed by Thy name,
Thy kingdom come,
Thy will be done,
On earth as it is in Heaven.
Give us this day our daily bread
And forgive us our trespasses,
As we forgive those who trespass against us.
And lead us not into temptation,
But deliver us from evil.
For Thine is the kingdom and the power and the glory. Forever."
While habit and recitation can't be all that our faith rests on, it certainly can be restorative and it truly can enable us to engage God when nothing else remains.
